Here’s the only thing MSNBC is missing in its ‘rah-rah war coverage’ [pic]!/Popehat/status/514453592900927488

It’s not funny, because it’s true.

Well, MSNBC totally thinks war is awesome now, guys. But its cheerleading-palooza needs a little something. @ExJon to the rescue!

MSNBC's rah-rah war coverage is fun to watch. All they're missing is an animated screaming eagle with blood-soaked talons.

— jon gabriel (@exjon) September 23, 2014

Aching. Sides.

@exjon the constant "pew, pew, pew" from the anchors, however, is a bit distracting.

— mr. big dubya (@mrbigdubya) September 23, 2014

Stop it! No, don’t. Please go on.

@exjon Obama's war is much more palatable than Bush's war.

— Puim (@NotreDameFan27) September 23, 2014

@exjon It truly is remarkable. We all joked about it before if it happened and it is exactly as we thought it would be.

— Garrett (@garrettsd) September 23, 2014

@exjon New war-happy MSNBC be like

— David Burge (@iowahawkblog) September 23, 2014

Sadly, the eagle graphic may be delayed.

@exjon the guy that was supposed to put the graphic together was detained in the #FloodWallStreet protests – bummer.

— Jenn Jacques (@JennJacques) September 23, 2014

Snort. But no worries! There’s this in the meantime:

@exjon Tune in for tonight's special MSNBC report, "How I Stopped Worrying and Learned to Love Blank-Check Unilateral War."

— John Hayward (@Doc_0) September 23, 2014


Media love Obama’s war, but what should it be called? This name suggestion is GENIUS

Hold up: Wolf Blitzer said THIS is the difference between Syria campaign and other wars?

Here’s how Democrats’ war hypocrisy can be summed up with one brilliant tweet

AP reporter deletes tweets after cheerleading for Obama, getting facts wrong

Read more: